Below is the opening paragraph for an essay that has been "brewing" inside me for some time now. Give it a read and let me know what you think in terms of pursuing it further.


A great deal has been written about the ground-breaking nature of the Norman Lear’s situation comedies of the 1970’s, and it is true that shows like All in the Family and its spin offs, Maude and The Jeffersons stared down the issues of the day will a brass and bravado that may never be equaled. However, is it possible that the elite critics who first heralded this new era of television were not as discerning as they thought they were? Could it be that television was addressing the issues of race, ethnicity, the generation-gap, social activism, gender equity, and gender-identity much earlier and they were quite simply not perceptive enough to recognize it? While other programs of the mid-60’s certainly deserve analysis, the culture clash embedded in television’s first mixed marriage serves as a fertile ground for discussing the realities behind the hyper-normalcy of the American suburbia of the 1960’s and the dirty little family secrets that must be kept hidden from the neighbors, all the while relentlessly pursuing the American dream of corporate success as defined by Madison avenue while keeping the typical American family intact.  Never being taken quite seriously by middle-class America, the artistic community, or even the actors themselves, the television series Bewitched allowed the Stevens family, friends, and extended family to hold a mirror to the American society of the 60’s that was magical and not nearly as distorted as we would like to think.

Scot Carlson
6/5/2013 04:48:51 am

Arguably, three generations (21 years) of Americans have openly and abstractly tackled social issues to include civil rights. Yet we strain with the concept of equality and tollerance over the differences in gender, race, sexual orientation, and median income for that matter. A look into how the entertainment industry depicts our unsolved national argument will be an excellent exploration. I say, have a go.

Reply
Tiffany
6/5/2013 07:31:54 am

This was an interesting conversation today! I think you've done a great job with the introduction. As for me, the only thing I struggle with is making the connection to these television shows. But that may be because I'm not your intended audience. I just don't have the background knowledge. Who is your audience for this piece, just out of curiosity?

Reply
Eddie
6/5/2013 12:05:50 pm

I really need to go back and watch this show more. It seems like it was always on in the background in reruns throughout my childhood, but I'm not sure if I ever stopped to watch more than a few minutes at a time.

If you pursue this further, there's an excellent documentary called The Celluloid Closet that talks about the Uncle Arthur character (and lots of other similar flamboyant character types that could be gay as a goose as long as they never came out and admitted it).

As an introductory paragraph, however, I think it's solid.

Reply



Leave a Reply.